Phonological Classification of Arabic Based on Articulatory Similarities with Indonesian: A Comparative Linguistic Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15642/jalsat.2024.4.2.174-189Keywords:
Articulation, Arabic, Indonesian, Phonology, ComparativeAbstract
This study is an attempt to provide an alternative solution to a common issue at the foundational level of Arabic language learning, namely letter recognition. For non-native speakers, articulation often poses a significant challenge, and misarticulation can lead to numerous subsequent problems related to speaking and listening skills. This research compares the phonology of Arabic and Indonesian letters to develop instructional materials for beginner-level Arabic learners. The study employs a qualitative method based on a comparative approach, analyzing the articulation of each letter in both languages. The findings indicate that the teaching of Arabic letter articulation to Indonesian speakers should begin with groups of letters that have identical articulation, followed by groups with similar articulation, and finally, those with distinct articulation.
Downloads
References
Abdul, C. (2003). Linguistik Umum. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Alwi, H., Dardjowidjojo, S., Lapoliwa, H., & Moeliono, A. M. (2003). Tata bahasa baku bahasa Indonesia. Balai Pustaka.
Aziez, F., & Alwasilah, A. C. (1996). Pengajaran Bahasa Komunikatif: Teori dan Praktek. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Prentice Hall Regents.
Dalton, C., & Seidlhofer, B. (1994). Pronunciation. OUP Oxford.
Field, J. (2003). Promoting perception: Lexical segmentation in L2 listening. ELT Journal, 57(4), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.4.325
Fitriani, R. S., & Nabila, R. (2020). Interferensi Bahasa Indonesia Sebagai Bagian Dari Rumpun Bahasa Austronesia. Prosiding Balai Arkeologi Jawa Barat, 197–204.
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning theory, findings, and problems. Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research/York.
Hidayah, R. (2009). Psikologi pengasuhan anak. UIN-Maliki Press.
Ibnu Jinni. (1993). Sirr Shina’at Al-I’rab. Dar Al-Qalam.
James, C. (1986). Contrastive Analysis. Longman.
Kumalasari, N. (2020). Metode Tilawati meningkatkan kesadaran Fonologi dalam membaca Huruf Hijaiyah pada anak usia dini di Tk Bahrul Ulum Surabaya [PhD Thesis]. UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.
Ladefoged, P., & Maddieson, I. (1996). The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Wiley.
Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures: Applied linguistics for language teachers. University of Michigan Press.
Liakin, D., Cardoso, W., & Liakina, N. (2015). Learning L2 pronunciation with a mobile speech recognizer: French /y/. CALICO Journal, 32(1), 1–25.
Nur, T. (2016). Analisis kontrastif dalam studi bahasa. Arabi: Journal of Arabic Studies, 1(2), Article 2.
Nurbayan, Y. (2008). Metodologi Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. bandung: zein al bayan.
Ortega, L. (2013). Understanding second language acquisition. Routledge. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=697118
Sholihin, M. N. (2020). Peran Ilmu Al-Ashwat dalam Pelafalan Huruf Hijaiyah (KajianTeoritik Linguistik Terapan). SALIHA: Jurnal Pendidikan & Agama Islam, 3(2), 110–127.
Swan, M., & Smith, B. (2001). Learner English: A Teacher’s Guide to Interference and Other Problems. Cambridge University Press.
Yavas, M. S. (2006). Applied English Phonology. John Wiley & Sons.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Bachrul Ulum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
