Strategi Kesantunan dalam Dakwah

Studi pada Ceramah Gus Iqdam di YouTube

Authors

  • Azzam Zafir Ibrahim UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Moh Khoirul Anam UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15642/jicos.2026.4.1.1-17

Keywords:

politeness strategies, digital da‘wah, Gus Iqdam, religious communication, politeness theory

Abstract

The dynamics of da‘wah in the digital era are frequently confronted with the challenge of maintaining ethical communication within fluid public spheres. This academic concern arises from the phenomenon of da‘wah content that often appears confrontational and insufficiently sensitive to the audience’s “face,” thereby potentially diminishing the effectiveness of message delivery. This study aims to analyze the politeness strategies employed in the preaching communication of Gus Iqdam.  Adopting a qualitative research design, the study examines three sermon transcripts from Gus Iqdam’s official YouTube channel. Data analysis is conducted using the Politeness Theory framework developed by Penelope Brown and Stephen C. Levinson. The findings reveal that Gus Iqdam predominantly employs positive politeness strategies, manifested through intimate forms of address, humor, and personal storytelling to foster closeness and solidarity with the audience. Complementarily, he applies negative politeness strategies, such as the use of refined language and apologies to respect the personal space of congregants, as well as off-record strategies through analogies and rhetorical questions to convey criticism indirectly. This combination of strategies successfully generates an inclusive, effective, and minimally face-threatening model of da‘wah communication. The study concludes by proposing a contextualized politeness strategy model for digital preachers-one that not only aims to disseminate religious messages but also to cultivate positive and sustainable relationships with audiences in digital environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agus Prasetyo, S. (2019). Positive politeness strategies in prabowo’s winning declarations as an Indonesian president candidate. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(10), 3093–3098.

Al-Khatib, M. A. (2023). The Concept of Justice in Islam: A Socio-pragmatic Analysis. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 10(5 Special Issue), 45–66. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1749

Alkhresheh, M. M. (2025). Strategies of Facebook Users in Offering Congratulations on Crown Prince Al Hussein’s Wedding. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 15(3), 737–742. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1503.08

Alqahtani, H. (2024). Applying Brown and Levinson’s model to investigate the differences in the use of politeness strategies between spoken Saudi and British English. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 5(4), 57–73. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.58256/fhmnk974

Altakhaineh, A. R. M., Hasheish, M. A., & Hamaydeh, D. (2024). Pragmatic Failures in Intercultural Communication: Evidence from Jordan. Psycholinguistics, 36(2), 38–62. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2024-36-2-38-62

Aporbo, R. J., Barabag, J. M. C., Catig, B. U., & Claveria, C. M. P. (2024). Face-threatening and Face-saving Speech Acts of Teachers: A Discourse Analysis of Classroom Interactions. World Journal of English Language, 14(3), 413–439. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n3p413

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage (1 ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085

Faridah, A. N., & Anam, M. K. (2024). Strategi Komunikasi Dakwah Akun Instagram @yufid.tv: Analisis Semiotika Charles Sanders Peirce. Journal of Islamic Communication Studies, 2(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.15642/jicos.2024.2.2.1-11

Fauzi, D., Rokhman, F., Rustono, n., & Mardikantoro, H. B. (2025). Speech act of political figures in the discourse of educational development: An interpersonal pragmatic approach. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 12(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2463728

Federici, A. (2025). The pragmatics of online healthcare communication: Politeness strategies in an anxiety and depression support community. Journal of Pragmatics, 246, 74–89. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2025.06.010

Gus Iqdam Official (Direktur). (2024a, Februari 29). Keutamaan Sholat Dhuha dan Kunci Ketahanan Hidup dengan Gus Iqdam [Video recording]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MpC7F_0c60

Gus Iqdam Official (Direktur). (2024b, Juni 28). Menikmati Hidup dengan Bersyukur: Pengajian Rutinan Gus Iqdam [Video recording]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ij-BvWbSBIc

Gus Iqdam Official (Direktur). (2025, Agustus 23). Jangan Nunggu Hidup Berantakan Baru Inget Ngaji! | Malam Jumat Bareng Gus Iqdam (cuplikan) [Video recording]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvNT90MdPYA

Humood, A. S., & Faisal, W. M. (2024). Shadows of Language: Revealing the Multifaceted Nature of Euphemistic Expressions in Biden’s Speeches. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(8), 2510–2519. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1408.24

Hussein, S. F. F., & Rashid, R. A. (2023). Unveiling the Subtle Art of Politeness: An Analysis of Jordanian Educators’ Deployment of Linguistic Strategies in the Official WhatsApp Group. Arab World English Journal, 14(3), 231–254. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol14no3.15

Kemp, S. (2025, Februari 25). Digital 2025: Indonesia. DataReportal – Global Digital Insights. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2025-indonesia

Kusumaswarih, K. K. (2018). Strategi Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Belajar Bahasa, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.32528/bb.v3i2.1583

Lukman, L., Merling, A., Haryeni, H., Hasjim, M., & Indarwati, I. (2024). Addressing And Politeness Strategies in Lecturer-Student Interaction in The Whatsapp Platform: A Pragmatics Perspective. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(4), 2169–2187. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i4.3714

Manie, H. I. A., Al-Sayyed, S. W., Alkhawaja, L. A., & Rababa’h, B. B. (2025). Congratulation Strategies of Crown Prince Hussein’s Wedding: A Socio-pragmatic Study of Facebook Comments. Open Cultural Studies, 9(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1515/culture-2025-0051

Matsuoka, M., & Matsuoka, R. (2022). Cultivation of Solidarity and Soft Power: Ukrainian President Zelensky’s 2022 Speech to Japan. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 9(2), 98–115. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2022.9.2.mat

Migdadi, F., Al-Momani, K., & Hammouri, I. (2025). Politeness Strategies in Arabic-Scripted Friday Khutbah (“Sermons”). Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 16(1), 232–241. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1601.24

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (Edition 3). SAGE Publications.

Mohd Nordin, N. R. M., Hamza, M. H., & Hussin, Z. (2024). Politeness Strategies in Declining Invitations: A Cross-Cultural Analysis between Iraqi Arabs and Kurds. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 30(2), 218–230. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2024-3002-14

Moorthi, S., Shet, J. P., Raj, D. S. P., Kishore, S. H., Natarajan, M., & Paulina, C. (2024). Do They Mind Their Psand Qs: Politeness Strategies in the Movie, Joy. World Journal of English Language, 14(1), 337–349. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n1p337

Nurrochmah, E. U. N. (2025). Gaya Komunikasi pada Live Shopping Produk Kecantikan di TikTok: Perspektif Komunikasi Islam. Journal of Islamic Communication Studies, 3(2), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.15642/jicos.2025.3.2.118-132

Prayitno, H. J., Huda, M., Inayah, N., Ermanto, E., Ardi, H., Giyoto, G., & Yusof, N. (2021). Politeness of Directive Speech Acts on Social Media Discourse and Its Implications for Strengthening Student Character Education in the Era of Global Education. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(4), 179–200. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i4.16205

Sayogie, F. (2022). Framing Face-Saving Behavior on Facebook. International Journal of Media and Information Literacy, 7(2), 554–559. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.13187/ijmil.2022.2.554

Simatupang, L., & Muta’Ali, A. (2023). The discourse of motivation: Judges’ Comments in The Voice Kids Indonesia (hlm. 147–159). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4775-1_9

Smadi, A. M., Al-Sayyed, S. W., Bani Younes, M. A. S. B., Al-Momani, D. F., & Alazaizeh, S. M. (2023). Positive Politeness Strategies Employed by Jordanian Facebook Users: A Case From Comments on the Roya News Facebook Page. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(11), 3006–3018. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1311.31

Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan aneka teknik analisa bahasa: Pengantar penelitian wahana kebudayaan. Sanata Dharma University.

Swasono, E. P., Sumarlam, S., & Nugroho, M. (2025). Politeness Strategies in Divorce Mediation Within Indonesian Religious Courts. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 15(1), 166–174. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1501.19

Tasyarasita, A. Z., & Yulianti, W. (2025). Polite Disagreement: How Sellers Manage Conflict in Social Media Sales. Studies in Media and Communication, 13(1), 241–254. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v13i1.7239

Wearesocial. (2025). Digital 2025: The essential guide to the global state of digital—We Are Social Indonesia. https://wearesocial.com/id/blog/2025/02/digital-2025-the-essential-guide-to-the-global-state-of-digital/

Yani, S. M. (2024). Konstruksi Berita Pernikahan Siri di Media Online: Analisis Framing kompas.Com dan republika.co.id pada Tahun 2022. KOMUNIKASIA: Journal of Islamic Communication and Broadcasting, 4(1), 56–87. https://doi.org/10.32923/kpi.v4i1.3907

Yergazy, N., & Denisenko, A. V. (2024). Implementation of Positive and Negative Politeness Strategies in Kazakh and Russian Family Discourse Talk Show. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 15(4), 1232–1244. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2024-15-4-1232-1244

Downloads

Published

31-01-2026

How to Cite

Ibrahim, A. Z., & Anam, M. K. . (2026). Strategi Kesantunan dalam Dakwah: Studi pada Ceramah Gus Iqdam di YouTube. Journal of Islamic Communication Studies, 4(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.15642/jicos.2026.4.1.1-17

Issue

Section

Articles