Wacana Tayangan Trans 7 tentang Pondok Pesantren Lirboyo

Analisis Sentimen pada Media Sosial Instagram akun@santrikeren

Authors

  • Viola Ananda Ayu Lestari UIN Sunan Ampel, Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15642/jicos.2026.4.1.46-56

Keywords:

sentiment analysis, Pondok Pesantren Lirboyo, social media, Trans7, digital da‘wah

Abstract

The development of digital media has fundamentally transformed patterns of public communication, including the discourse of Islam in Indonesia. One phenomenon that has sparked widespread public debate is a broadcast by Trans7 depicting the lives of students (santri) at Pondok Pesantren Lirboyo, which generated both support and criticism across social media platforms. This study aims to analyze public sentiment and emotional responses to the broadcast through comments posted on the Instagram account @santrikeren, and to examine how digital discourse is constructed as a form of social representation of the pesantren community. The research employs a descriptive qualitative method with a content analysis approach supported by Orange Data Mining software. Data were collected through the scraping of Instagram comments, followed by preprocessing, sentiment classification, and emotion analysis. The findings reveal that public sentiment is predominantly neutral (55%), followed by negative (34%) and positive (10%) responses. The distribution of emotions indicates the dominance of joy and surprise, reflecting both pride and moral astonishment regarding the representation of pesantren in mainstream media. Discourse analysis further demonstrates that the pesantren public utilizes social media as a space of articulation to produce counter-discourse in response to media framing. These findings affirm that social media functions not only as a space for emotional expression but also as an arena of digital da‘wah that reinforces Islamic identity, ethical conduct (adab), and morality within the modern public sphere.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agustin, N. (2011). Media Massa dan Perubahan Sosial di Era Digital. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Ashadi, S. (2005). Media Online dan Tantangan Demokrasi Informasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.

Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: Sage Publications.re

Kusumaningsih, D. (2024). Pengaruh media digital terhadap pola komunikasi Generasi Z di Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi dan Media Digital, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.22219/jkmd.v5i1.15678

Nguyen, C. T. (2018). Echo chambers and epistemic bubbles. Episteme, 17(2), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2018.32

Nurdin, A., Sulaeman, S., & Ridwan, M. (2022). The expression of millennial female journalists’ idealism: Experiences of female journalists in Surabaya, Indonesia. Brazilian Journalism Research, 18(1), 214–237. https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v18n1.2022.1459

Pratama, Y. D., & Ardianto, E. (2021). Media sosial sebagai ruang diskursus publik: Analisis sentimen isu sosial di Instagram. Jurnal Komunikasi Massa, 7(2), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.24002/jkm.v7i2.4455

Rahmawati, F., & Nurdin, A. (2023). Dakwah digital dan polarisasi opini publik di era media sosial. Jurnal Komunikasi Islam, 13(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.24042/jki.v13i1.12433

Rizky, A., & Marwan, I. (2022). Analisis sentimen publik terhadap isu keagamaan menggunakan Orange Data Mining. Indonesian Journal of Computer Science Research, 1(1), 35–46.

Rosyid, A. N., & Mulyono, S. (2021). Etika komunikasi Islam dalam media sosial. Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah dan Komunikasi, 5(2), 200–216.

Downloads

Published

31-01-2026

How to Cite

Lestari, V. A. A. (2026). Wacana Tayangan Trans 7 tentang Pondok Pesantren Lirboyo: Analisis Sentimen pada Media Sosial Instagram akun@santrikeren. Journal of Islamic Communication Studies, 4(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.15642/jicos.2026.4.1.46-56

Issue

Section

Articles